Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #6102Re: 486 vs. 386
From: John Wu
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 23:03
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 23:03
21 lines
1668 bytes
1668 bytes
In article <vjn1bhr@rpi.edu> moncrg@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Gregory Donald Moncreaff) writes: >article <1992Nov9.200839.27999@exu.ericsson.se> exuhag@exu.ericsson.se writes: >> >>Not to mention that very few people actually need a 586 (aka Pentium). >>How many people--excepting ray-tracing fanatics and people who do >>serious number crunching--have had any speed problems with a 33 MHz >>486? >> >does any one remember when they asked us, "who really needs a 486?" > Or from the November 25, 1986 issue of PC Mag... "Certainly not everyone is going to need or want a 386 PC. Fast 80286 PC's will become the new office-automation standard...." ^^^^ -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - John Wu "I saw a bird in my sight - - johnwu@netcom.com something dropped into my eye - - jmw@ocf.berkeley.edu I'm a big boy so I won't cry - - I'm sure glad that cows don't fly!" - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov11.230304.29747@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!johnwuReferences:
<BxFpHv.8zB@news.orst.edu> <1992Nov9.200839.27999@exu.ericsson.se> <vjn1bhr@rpi.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!johnwu From: johnwu@netcom.com (John Wu) Subject: Re: 486 vs. 386 Message-ID: <1992Nov11.230304.29747@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <BxFpHv.8zB@news.orst.edu> <1992Nov9.200839.27999@exu.ericsson.se> <vjn1bhr@rpi.edu> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 23:03:04 GMT Lines: 21