Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #6193Re: Windows accelerators, Paradise or Diamond???
From: Kim-Kiat Tan
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:15
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:15
12 lines
1186 bytes
1186 bytes
In article <1992Sep27.142855.1@cstp.umkc.edu> lcsim@cstp.umkc.edu (Lin-Chow Sim) writes: >In article <12160031@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM>, calloway@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Frank Calloway) writes: >> This isn't related to hardware performance, but in my experience Diamond's >> technical support has been *terrible*. I've had my Diamond Stealth card > >> I'm pissed. My advice to anybody considering a Windows accelerator card >> is to buy anything but Diamond if you care about support. I'm currently >shell out a couple of more bugs for a ATI :( > Anyone knows of 24 bits true color accelerated graphic card by ATI ?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep28.141528.19316@philabs.philips.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!philabs!kktReferences:
<9226113.29743@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <12160031@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM> <1992Sep27.142855.1@cstp.umkc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!philabs!kkt From: kkt@philabs.philips.com (Kim-Kiat Tan) Subject: Re: Windows accelerators, Paradise or Diamond??? Message-ID: <1992Sep28.141528.19316@philabs.philips.com> Sender: news@philabs.philips.com (Mr. C. News) Organization: Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff, New York References: <9226113.29743@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <12160031@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM> <1992Sep27.142855.1@cstp.umkc.edu> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:15:28 GMT Lines: 13