Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #643Re: OS/2 and ET4000 cards
From: Steve.Withers
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1992 01:47
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1992 01:47
40 lines
2857 bytes
2857 bytes
In article <BsMHHB.3Ft@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson) writes: > nsus_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Nick Susch) writes: > > >In <1992Aug7.115338.3610@actrix.gen.nz> Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes: > > >Ah, I bought OS/2 and used it for about 2 weeks. It runs the top 100 DOS and > >Windows program, and thats about it. And it runs them VERY SLOWLY if they > >have any graphics at all in them. Why go to OS/2 to run DOS and Windows > >programs? Why not just run them under DOS and Windows, where they were made > >to run, and run a lot faster? OS/2 doesn't give you access to any more > >programs; of the few programs that run under OS/2, they are all available > >for DOS and Windows. From the way this is set up, you might think I wrote the above. I didn't (I think Iskandar Tahb did). As far os OS/2 running the top 100 DOS and Windows apps is concerned - that is total crap. Lie would be a better word, but I don't think Iskandar is being deliberatley misleading. > > I hate to see this started over hear, but at any rate. Maybe to have a > more stable system for one. And so you can do multiple things at once. I'll > agree that running a single app is sometimes faster under windows. However, > if you have a number crunching program in the background and you run a word > processor I don't think you would crunch numbers very fast. True real number > crunching should be done on a cray, but it's nice to see your flow solver > running in the background while you write a paper. OS/2 multi-tasks so smoothly it makes Windows look like dog doo-doo. Especially with native OS/2 apps - of which I have a growing number (DeScribe, Bitfax, etc....). I can send and receive faxes in the background with virtually no degradation in performance. Windows *never* did that. As for the video card question that started this thread, OS/2 will do 640x480x16 with almost any card in existence. If you want SVGA, the range narrows to only about a dozen of the most popular cards and their clones. -- Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | "But the glory kept shining Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz | and bright in my eyes, withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz | And the stars going round in **** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! **** | my head." R. L. S.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug9.014738.90@actrix.gen.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!Steve.WithersReferences:
<1992Aug7.115338.3610@actrix.gen.nz> <1992Aug7.153955.19526@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <BsMHHB.3Ft@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!Steve.Withers Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: OS/2 and ET4000 cards Message-ID: <1992Aug9.014738.90@actrix.gen.nz> From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1992 01:47:38 GMT Sender: Steve.Withers@actrix.gen.nz (Steve Withers) References: <1992Aug7.115338.3610@actrix.gen.nz> <1992Aug7.153955.19526@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <BsMHHB.3Ft@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Organization: Actrix Information Exchange Lines: 40