Re: QEMM386 or 386MAX? Advice wanted.

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #7057

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#7057

From: Marc Snyder
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 1991 16:00

18 lines
1501 bytes

In article <kusumoto.664499099@chsun1> kusumoto@chsun1.uchicago.edu (Bob Kusumoto) writes:
>
>... I believe both only allow TSRs to be loaded high in real or standard
>modes (you can use the 386 Enh mode if you don't let these programs relocated
>your TSRs into High RAM, although I've read some press that people have been
>able to load TSRs high and run in 386 Enh mode as well, but I haven't seen it
>work yet.  

I am currently running QEMM 5.11 with Windows 3.0.  I am also using DEC's
PCSA (now Pathworks, I believe).  I have loaded almost all of the drivers
required by PCSA into high memory, and run Windows in enhanced mode.  The
machine in question is an AST 386sx/16 with 3MB of RAM.  I have this
configuration operating on several other machines as well.
--
Marc Snyder                     UUCP: ...philabs!crpmks!marcs
System Administrator                  ...gaboon!crpmks!marcs 
Ciba-Geigy Corporation
Hawthorne, New York          Work: 914.785.2284      Play: 914.347.6440

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1435@crpmks.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!philabs!crpmks!marcs

References: <BCHEN.91Jan21114625@wpi.WPI.EDU> <kusumoto.664499099@chsun1>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!philabs!crpmks!marcs
From: marcs@crpmks.UUCP (Marc Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: QEMM386 or 386MAX? Advice wanted.
Message-ID: <1435@crpmks.UUCP>
Date: 23 Jan 91 16:00:51 GMT
References: <BCHEN.91Jan21114625@wpi.WPI.EDU> <kusumoto.664499099@chsun1>
Reply-To: marcs@crpmks.UUCP (Marc Snyder)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ciba-Geigy Corporation
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message