Re: 4DOS vs. COMMAND.COM (sigh)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #7546

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#7546

From: Jim Foster
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 1991 13:37

15 lines
1264 bytes

In article <2uB8w1@moocow.uucp>, george@moocow.uucp (George Tirebiter) says:
>
>I've been seeing a number of posts where a replacement for COMMAND.COM
>called 4DOS is mentioned.  Has anybody had any positive or negative
>experiences they'd like to share?  Is 4DOS more than a command-line
>recall and batch file enhancer?  What's the latest version?
>
I've just started experimenting with it.  So far I've found one
incompatability when running Extra! for Windows through a Token-ring DLC
connection.  It just doesn't seem to work.  Other than that, it seems to
be an very nice package.
--
Jim Foster - MADIF@ROHVM1.BITNET    DoD #142            Rohm and Haas Company
Systems Programmer                  1984 NightHawk-S    Independence Mall West
(215) 592-2446, 592-3377 (FAX)      1987 Ninja 250      Philadelphia, PA 19105

Technical Details

Message-ID: <91043.083714MADIF@ROHVM1.BITNET>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!cunyvm!rohvm1!madif

References: <2uB8w1@moocow.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!cunyvm!rohvm1!madif
From: MADIF@ROHVM1.BITNET (Jim Foster)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: 4DOS vs. COMMAND.COM (sigh)
Message-ID: <91043.083714MADIF@ROHVM1.BITNET>
Date: 12 Feb 91 13:37:14 GMT
References: <2uB8w1@moocow.uucp>
Organization: Rohm and Haas Company
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message