Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #7694Re: building a clone: good stuff vs. trash?
From: ONG ENG TENG
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 1991 20:20
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 1991 20:20
9 lines
1044 bytes
1044 bytes
From article <1991Feb15.201920.13743@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU>, by lairdt@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Tom Laird): > First of all I'd get a different chassis. The smaller chassis run hotter > and are a big pain to upgrade at any point - not enough space. > I also would avoid an IDE drive, especially a Seagate. IDE drives are SLOW > and turn out about 500-600k per second throughput - a bad idea to hook up > such a slow drive to a fast system. IDE drive slow? How about Conners IDE? Most people I know seems to go IDE way. Is it just because of cost?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Feb16.202022.2496@d.cs.okstate.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!ariel.unm.edu!unmvax!uokmax!d.cs.okstate.edu!ongReferences:
<1991Feb15.201920.13743@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!ariel.unm.edu!unmvax!uokmax!d.cs.okstate.edu!ong From: ong@d.cs.okstate.edu (ONG ENG TENG) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: building a clone: good stuff vs. trash? Message-ID: <1991Feb16.202022.2496@d.cs.okstate.edu> Date: 16 Feb 91 20:20:22 GMT References: <1991Feb15.201920.13743@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> Organization: Oklahoma State University Lines: 9