🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #7732

Re: Borland C++

#7732
From: Larry Maturo
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 1991 15:05
50 lines
3466 bytes
In article <6843@mace.cc.purdue.edu> dve@mace.cc.purdue.edu writes:

   Path: titan!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!emory!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mace.cc.purdue.edu!dve
   From: dve@mace.cc.purdue.edu
   Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
   Date: 17 Feb 91 20:14:04 GMT
   References: <HUDGENS.91Feb17113724@sun13.sun13.SCRI.FSU.EDU> <1991Feb17.115749.18934@hellgate.utah.edu>
   Lines: 12


>       There have been some discussion/speculation about the new

>       Borland C++ and Borland C++ Pro (distinguishing from Turbo C++
>       in names) in comp.sys.ms.windows.
>           The new C++ packages are supposed to supersede the
>       existing C++ and in addition provide Windows 3.0 tools to
>       write true windows software, for which purpose the MS Windows SDK
>       is NOT needed. It's also speculated that the price will still
>       be competitive. So it seems that there's no point buying Turbo C++
>       anymore, at least for those who use windows. The software is
>       supposed to ship anytime now, such as in a week or so.


This is not entirely true.  They still sell Turbo C++ and Turbo C++
Professional for those developers not using Windows because the Borland C++
needs 2 MEGs of memory minimum.  If you don't have that much memory you
still can't write Windows programs.  Borland C++ also needs 15 Megs of
disk space.  This is not as much of a problem as it sounds since Turbo C++
Professional also needed about 15 Megs of disk space.  The difference,
however, is that the Professional part of Turbo C++ was optional and
could save space if you didn't install it.  For Borland C++ there is
no professional version.  The one package has both parts, though not
having received it yet I don't know if you can optionally leave part
of it out. 

As for shipping, I ordered it the first day they would let me (Valentines
Day) and they did not have a ship date set yet.  


+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
|                                   |                                        |
| Larry Maturo                      | Opinions expressed herein must be      |
| Applied Research Laboratories     | yours, neither I nor my employer have  |
| University of Texas at Austin     | any.                                   |
| P.O. Box 8029                     +----------------------------------------+
| Austin, Texas 78713-8029          |                                        |
|                                   | When you're as great as I am it's hard |
| larry @titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu | to be modest, but I succeed where      |
|                                   | others fail.                           |
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID: <LARRY.91Feb19090516@unicorn.titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!titan!larry
References: <HUDGENS.91Feb17113724@sun13.sun13.SCRI.FSU.EDU> <1991Feb17.115749.18934@hellgate.utah.edu> <6843@mace.cc.purdue.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!titan!larry
From: larry@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Larry Maturo)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Borland C++
Message-ID: <LARRY.91Feb19090516@unicorn.titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: 19 Feb 91 15:05:16 GMT
References: <HUDGENS.91Feb17113724@sun13.sun13.SCRI.FSU.EDU>
 <1991Feb17.115749.18934@hellgate.utah.edu> <6843@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Sender: news@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu
Organization: Applied Research Labs, The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 50
In-reply-to: dve@mace.cc.purdue.edu's message of 17 Feb 91 20:14:04 GMT