Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #7773Re: Borland C++
From: Steven R. Jacobs
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 1991 21:38
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 1991 21:38
51 lines
2869 bytes
2869 bytes
In article <1536@msa3b.UUCP> torre@msa3b.UUCP (Patrick Torre) writes:
> mikey@shuksan.UUCP (Mike Fields) writes:
>>I really appreciate paying $125 in Sept, getting the 1.01 upgrade
>>which fixed the initial release in November 90 and now being told that
>>I could have saved my $125 by waiting 6 months. Thanks a lot folks!!
>
> How many other people feel "screwed",
> I have not yet had the chance to use TC++,
> had to beg for the 1.01 upgrade (they wanted more money!)
> It is installed but no time to use it yet,
> and now there is something new, and cheaper than what I
> paid for the first upgrade!!
Yeah, I really hate how Borland has something better for less money.
Gosh, I wish they would charge us all full price and not let us get
sucked in by upgrades. I also wish they wouldn't improve their
products so quickly. What can they be thinking?
:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
What a bunch of whining weenies! I've bought every single upgrade since
Turbo C 1.0 came out, and the total cost has still been less than the
list price for the new Borland C++.
It is really quite simple, folks. If you don't need the improved
functionality of the upgrade, then don't buy it! Wait for the _next_
upgrade, and re-evaluate your position. Borland will probably have yet
another upgrade in 6 to 9 months, so if this one isn't worth buying
then don't buy it. This is called a free market. Awesome concept.
> Borland could make good money on the quality of their products
> but instead they milk their "loyal" customers.
Do you expect them to supply free upgrades for life?
Like Microsoft does? :-)
> Lets let them know how we feel!
> Kahn has written us enough letters, lets write him some!
> we are the customers , we pay their bills.
Go for it. 12 months from now, when you hear rumors that Borland
has a new version of the compiler ready but won't release it for
fear of customer backlash, you'll have something worse to bitch
about.
> dont let the sig fool you, I payed for TC++ with my
> own cash.
So did I. Versions 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, TC++, and now Borland C++.
They were all worth it.
--
Steve Jacobs ({bellcore,hplabs,uunet}!utah-cs!jacobs, jacobs@cs.utah.edu)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JACOBS.91Feb20133801@cmos.cs.utah.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!hellgate!jacobsReferences:
<HUDGENS.91Feb17113724@sun13.sun13.SCRI.FSU.EDU> <6843@mace.cc.purdue.edu> <540@shuksan.UUCP> <1536@msa3b.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!hellgate!jacobs From: jacobs@cs.utah.edu (Steven R. Jacobs) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Borland C++ Message-ID: <JACOBS.91Feb20133801@cmos.cs.utah.edu> Date: 20 Feb 91 21:38:01 GMT References: <HUDGENS.91Feb17113724@sun13.sun13.SCRI.FSU.EDU> <6843@mace.cc.purdue.edu> <540@shuksan.UUCP> <1536@msa3b.UUCP> Organization: University of Utah CS Dept Lines: 51 In-reply-to: torre@msa3b.UUCP's message of 19 Feb 91 22:44:45 GMT