🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Feb21.012733.22624@amd.com> phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes:
>In article <1991Feb18.211413.9429@qualcomm.com> rdippold@maui.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:
>|I much prefer the Borland licensing agreement, which has got to be one of the
>|most reasonable in this world of worthless licensing agreements.  I own Sprint,
>|and I can have it installed at work and at home legally, because the Borland
>|license says that I can put it on as many machines as I want, as long as I
>|never run more than one copy at the same time.  So in your case, as long
>|as you had as many copies of the program as could be run at once, you have no
>|more hassles.
>
>There is no difference of consequence between Borland's license and
>Microsoft's.
>

The difference being that I don't have to carry around that stupid little card
and have it in my posession when I use the software just to satisfy MS!  This
means a _great_ deal.