Re: PC-Cache (from PC Tools) and SMARTDRV.SYS

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #9151

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#9151

From: Victor C. Limary
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1991 04:12

21 lines
1171 bytes

cyang%peruvian.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Cheng Yang) writes:

> HI! Does anyone know how good PC-Cache (from PC Tools v6.0) is?
> 
> Is it better than the SMARTDRV.SYS (for MS-DOS and windows)?
> 
> Does Windows 3.0 work with PC-Cache?

I think that PC-Cache is better, since you can use expanded memory 
instead of extended.  Smartdrive messes comm programs since it access 
extended memory, and you start losing characters because it has to reset 
the processor (I think).   And PC-Cache seems to work just fine with 
Windows.  It also works well with Desqview.

       _______
      /       \
     |  O   O  |         Victor Limary
    <|    <    |>        mimas!vcl@bbx.basis.com
     |  _____  |
      \   U   /
       "-----"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <X8V0Z4w163w@mimas.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!unmvax!bbx!mimas!vcl

References: <1991Apr11.013231.27119@hellgate.utah.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!unmvax!bbx!mimas!vcl
From: vcl@mimas.UUCP (Victor C. Limary)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: PC-Cache (from PC Tools) and SMARTDRV.SYS
Message-ID: <X8V0Z4w163w@mimas.UUCP>
Date: 12 Apr 91 04:12:44 GMT
References: <1991Apr11.013231.27119@hellgate.utah.edu>
Organization: Albuquerque Academy, Albuquerque NM
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message