Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #9244Re: Freemacs or MG2a or Epsilon?
From: Marshall Abrams
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 20:27
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 20:27
8 lines
1104 bytes
1104 bytes
C/Lisp--compiled/interpreted?: Yeah, some of us prefer Lisp, but most people seem to like C. But for the purpose of running on a slow machine, a compiled extension language is essential. My guess is that what makes Brief and Freemacs so slow is that they don't compile to binary code. This can be a big liability when most of the editor is written in the extension language. I suppose GNU would be at least as bad on an 8088, if it could be run at all.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Apr15.202734.5556@midway.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!quads.uchicago.edu!ab2rReferences:
<PHR.91Apr13033047@lightning.Berkeley.EDU> <HOWCOME.91Apr9210555@media-lab.media.mit.edu> <1991Apr15.153319.16252@odin.corp.sgi.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.laptops,gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!quads.uchicago.edu!ab2r From: ab2r@quads.uchicago.edu (Marshall Abrams) Subject: Re: Freemacs or MG2a or Epsilon? Message-ID: <1991Apr15.202734.5556@midway.uchicago.edu> Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (NewsMistress) Organization: University of Chicago References: <PHR.91Apr13033047@lightning.Berkeley.EDU> <HOWCOME.91Apr9210555@media-lab.media.mit.edu> <1991Apr15.153319.16252@odin.corp.sgi.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 20:27:34 GMT