Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #2022Re: '386's SX's and DX's
From: Unrue Jack D
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 1990 19:06
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 1990 19:06
19 lines
1259 bytes
1259 bytes
In article <1990Jul22.234030.25727@utstat.uucp> philip@utstat.uucp (Philip McDunnough) writes: > >But isn't the 386sx restricted in the amount of memory it can address? If >that's the case, then would a 386sx be able to run OS/2 ver 2.0 ? I guess >I'm wondering if the SX includes ALL the 32 bit machine instructions of a >DX? Furthermore, what is the size of the data path between a 386SX and a >387SX? > Yeah, I think you and I are saying the same thing. SX's use a 16 bit bus, and OS/2 ver 2.0 inhabits a 32 bit address space, so the two don't go together. I think that's as far as I'll go, because I'm not sure about the data path between the 386SX and 387SX. -- -- Jack Unrue ultb::"jdu4855@cs.rit.edu"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1776@cs.rit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!uunet!ccicpg!cci632!rit!jdu4855References:
<31122@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <1773@cs.rit.edu> <1990Jul22.234030.25727@utstat.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!uunet!ccicpg!cci632!rit!jdu4855 From: jdu4855@cs.rit.edu (Unrue Jack D) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: '386's SX's and DX's Message-ID: <1776@cs.rit.edu> Date: 23 Jul 90 19:06:35 GMT References: <31122@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <1773@cs.rit.edu> <1990Jul22.234030.25727@utstat.uucp> Sender: news@cs.rit.edu Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Distribution: usa Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY Lines: 19