Re: Turbo C vs Turbo C Pro

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer

Article #1428

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Previous Next

#1428

From: Phil Blais
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 1990 17:02

13 lines
1069 bytes

In article <X#*#}Q$@rpi.edu>, zen@pawl.rpi.edu writes:
> 
> Turbo C Pro has two programs bundled with it besides Turbo C.
> The programs are Turbo Assembler, and Turbo Debugger. 

I hope I'm not opening a can of worms here but I've just gotta ask.
For those who have used both - how does Turbo C Pro compare with
Microsoft C with MASM, Codeview i.e. if given a choice and cost was
not an issue why would you chose one over the other? While were at it
might as well include Lattice also. (If all this has been previously
discussed and posted could someone please summarize by e-mail.)

phil blais	<dcdwest!plb@ucsd.edu>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <579@dcdwest.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucsdhub!dcdwest!plb

References: <2617@wyse.wyse.com> <X#*#}Q$@rpi.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucsdhub!dcdwest!plb
From: plb@dcdwest.UUCP (Phil Blais)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Turbo C vs Turbo C Pro
Summary: MSC vs Turbo
Message-ID: <579@dcdwest.UUCP>
Date: 1 Mar 90 17:02:05 GMT
References: <2617@wyse.wyse.com> <X#*#}Q$@rpi.edu>
Sender: news@dcdwest.UUCP
Distribution: usa
Organization: ITT Defense Communications, San Diego
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message