Re: Best C Compiler

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer

Article #153

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Previous Next

#153

From: tim anderson
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 1990 19:17

7 lines
1077 bytes

I have heard that (for 32 bit '386 compilers) Watcom is a bit better than
Metaware's. We picked Metaware's mainly because Autodesk recommended them. I
have since felt that we made a bad choice - NOT because the product was 
no good, but because Metaware has started shipping religious literature
with their C compiler. While I may or may not have qualms with their
religion, I find this to be incredibly unprofessional, leading me to question
the company as a whole...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1424@polari.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!sumax!amc-gw!thebes!polari!tima

References:

<1990Mar19.175316.16898@Octopus.COM> <3130@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> <1990Mar20.163453.29787@Octopus.COM> <2940@alpha.cam.nist.gov> <3362@trantor.harris-atd.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!sumax!amc-gw!thebes!polari!tima
From: tima@polari.UUCP (tim anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Best C Compiler
Message-ID: <1424@polari.UUCP>
Date: 23 Mar 90 19:17:18 GMT
References: <1990Mar19.175316.16898@Octopus.COM> <3130@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> <1990Mar20.163453.29787@Octopus.COM> <2940@alpha.cam.nist.gov> <3362@trantor.harris-atd.com>
Reply-To: tima@polari (tim anderson)
Organization: PolarServ, Seattle WA
Lines: 7
Keywords: Compilers
Summary: speaking of religion and computers...

Reply to Parent Message