Re: Turbo C or MSC

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer

Article #185

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Previous Next

#185

From: Steve Resnick
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 1990 03:00

10 lines
1067 bytes

>Both Quick C and Turbo C's integrated debuggers are toys,
>more suitable for home use; with the Turbo C Professional package you get
>Turbo Debugger, which is a considerable improvement on the Turbo C
>integrated debugger and makes CodeView look like DEBUG.  All in all,
>I'd reverse the categorizations you've applied to the two products.
>
I would welcome seeing a better debugger than Turbo Debug. I think td is the
best debugger I have ever used on any system. Barrning None!

Steve (My $.02)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Mar27.030041.696@Octopus.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!vsi1!octopus!stever

References:

<924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1468@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <9944@pyr.gatech.EDU> <35104@cci632.UUCP> <2602972a.42b0@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <1990Mar26.154024.11739@dasys1.uucp> <1990Mar26.174313.1976@eng.umd.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!vsi1!octopus!stever
From: stever@Octopus.COM (Steve Resnick )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Turbo C or MSC
Message-ID: <1990Mar27.030041.696@Octopus.COM>
Date: 27 Mar 90 03:00:41 GMT
References: <924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1468@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <9944@pyr.gatech.EDU> <35104@cci632.UUCP> <2602972a.42b0@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <1990Mar26.154024.11739@dasys1.uucp> <1990Mar26.174313.1976@eng.umd.edu>
Organization: Octopus Enterprises, Cupertino CA
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message