Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Article #500Re: Turbo C++ under OS/2 ??
From: John C. Archambeau
Date: Sun, 27 May 1990 05:16
Date: Sun, 27 May 1990 05:16
44 lines
2924 bytes
2924 bytes
davidi@well.sf.ca.us (David Intersimone) writes:
>in message 7820 John Archambeau asks if we will do Turbo C++ for os/2...
I quite frankly don't care if you do make an OS/2 product or not. What I
personally would like to see is a Xenix or Unix System V/386 3.2 based
compiler that is capable of compiling to any Intel based operating system out
there (i.e. OS/2 (even though I personally don't use it, others do), DOS,
Windows, and Unix System V/386 3.2). Currently, all one can do is just either
compile to DOS, Unix, or Xenix if you're using a Unix based compiler. OS/2
and Windows compilation from Unix doesn't exist.
My understaind based on what I've read (either from the FidoNet C conference
or in a magazine article) that Borland had no plans on ever developing OS/2
compilers. Well, if anybody's going to correct me, it might as well be the
manufacturer. :)
>So no announcement date, just showing our committment to all the three
>Intel chip based platforms.
Don't forget the fourth platform, Unix. As time marches on, I find I spend
more time in Unix. My DOS usage is so limited these days that I don't do
anything that VP/ix can't handle. Granted I did order Quattro Pro at the $99
promo price, but unfortunately I do not have the hard drive space to install
it under my current system. The big test for Quattro Pro will be if it runs
glitch free under VP/ix. Unfortunately, I don't have DOSWindows for the
Sun SPARCstation 1 at work, so I can't fire it up on there and see if it runs.
Something I think that Borland should consider doing is developing the
multiplatform Intel compiler that can compile from DOS to OS/2, OS/2 to Unix,
Unix to DOS, etc. I am happy with your DOS based C compiler as it does the
job quite nicely and look forward to seeing your C++ compiler, but within a
year or so time frame, I probably won't be looking for any more DOS software
at all since it will all will most likely be strictly Unix.
// JCA
/*
**--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
** Flames : /dev/null | Small memory model only for
** ARPANET : crash!pnet01!jca@nosc.mil | Unix? Get the (*bleep*) out
** INTERNET: jca@pnet01.cts.com | of here!
** UUCP : {nosc ucsd hplabs!hd-sdd}!crash!pnet01!jca
**--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
*/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2834@crash.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!pnet01!jcaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!pnet01!jca From: jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer,comp.lang.c++,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.os.os2 Subject: Re: Turbo C++ under OS/2 ?? Message-ID: <2834@crash.cts.com> Date: 27 May 90 05:16:02 GMT Sender: root@crash.cts.com Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA Lines: 44 X-Local-Date: 26 May 90 22:16:02 PDT