Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Article #63Re: Turbo C or MSC
From: John R. Dudeck
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 1990 19:59
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 1990 19:59
17 lines
1465 bytes
1465 bytes
In article <35104@cci632.UUCP> lmm@op632.UUCP (Lance Michel) writes: >In article <9944@pyr.gatech.EDU> peggy@pyr.UUCP (Cris Simpson) writes: >>In article <1468@watserv1.waterloo.edu> tom@mims-iri (Tom Haapanen) writes: >>>>> Do you know of some real and important differences that could move >>>>> me to select Microsoft C instead of Turbo C ? > >NO! There is some value to using the industry standard for production work. On the other hand the "real" differences are probably insignificant. Borland is turning out stuff that is just as rock-solid as Microsoft, and they are pretty much in the same league. Borland does have the advantage of lower cost. -- John Dudeck "You want to read the code closely..." jdudeck@Polyslo.CalPoly.Edu -- C. Staley, in OS course, teaching ESL: 62013975 Tel: 805-545-9549 Tanenbaum's MINIX operating system.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2602972a.42b0@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ns-mx!iowasp!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!rutgers!usc!jarthur!petunia!polyslo!jdudeckReferences:
<924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1468@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <9944@pyr.gatech.EDU> <35104@cci632.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ns-mx!iowasp!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!rutgers!usc!jarthur!petunia!polyslo!jdudeck From: jdudeck@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (John R. Dudeck) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Subject: Re: Turbo C or MSC Message-ID: <2602972a.42b0@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> Date: 17 Mar 90 19:59:38 GMT References: <924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1468@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <9944@pyr.gatech.EDU> <35104@cci632.UUCP> Reply-To: jdudeck@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (John R. Dudeck) Distribution: na Organization: Cal Poly State University -- San Luis Obispo Lines: 17