Re: Best C Compiler

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer

Article #96

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Previous Next

#96

From: Steve Resnick
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 1990 16:34

14 lines
1202 bytes

In article <3130@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> kaleb@mars.UUCP (Kaleb Keithley) writes:
>
>I can't imagine what you did, I compiled 3.10 with MSC 5.1, no internal errors,
>it created an 88102 byte executable that doesn't crash at all.  It even uses my 
Well, I used the MSC 5.1 which came with my OS/2 SDK. This is allegedly supposed
to generate DOS code. The args to cl were: -c -Ox -AL. The internal error is
encountered when compiling buffer.c with optimzations. The error that comes up
is fatal error 1001: Internal compiler error in file code.c 1.42 (or something
close, I don't have my compiler here...).

Granted, my opinion of MSC is not very high, I would still be interested in how 
you got Emacs to compile alright...

Steve

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Mar20.163453.29787@Octopus.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ncar!ames!vsi1!octopus!stever

References: <1990Mar19.175316.16898@Octopus.COM> <3130@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ncar!ames!vsi1!octopus!stever
From: stever@Octopus.COM (Steve Resnick )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Best C Compiler
Keywords: Compilers
Message-ID: <1990Mar20.163453.29787@Octopus.COM>
Date: 20 Mar 90 16:34:53 GMT
References: <1990Mar19.175316.16898@Octopus.COM> <3130@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Reply-To: stever@octopus.UUCP (Steve Resnick )
Organization: Octopus Enterprises, Cupertino CA
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message