Re: DOS 4.0 versus DOS 3.3 ... so?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer

Article #349

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Previous Next

#349

From: Phil Hughes
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 1990 19:21

8 lines
750 bytes

[discussion of why DOS 4.01 is great and/or a dog deleted]

This brings up the question: is there a way to work with bigger partitions
under DOS 3.3?

-- 
Phil Hughes, SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155  (206)FOR-UNIX
     uunet!pilchuck!ssc!fyl or attmail!ssc!fyl            (206)527-3385

Technical Details

Message-ID: <650@ssc.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pilchuck!ssc!fyl

References: <1J37g2w161w@cattie.UUCP> <3334@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> <3444@trantor.harris-atd.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pilchuck!ssc!fyl
From: fyl@ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: DOS 4.0 versus DOS 3.3 ... so?
Summary: Bigger partitions on DOS 3.3
Keywords: DOS4.0, DOS3.3, why, why not
Message-ID: <650@ssc.UUCP>
Date: 13 Apr 90 19:21:29 GMT
References: <1J37g2w161w@cattie.UUCP> <3334@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> <3444@trantor.harris-atd.com>
Organization: SSC, Inc., Seattle, WA
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message