Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Article #1939hc2.1y and dbx
From: Richard Campbell
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1990 22:57
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1990 22:57
10 lines
796 bytes
796 bytes
At the Washington Usenix RT/AOS4.3 bof, it was mentioned that hc2.1y was in very good shape and that it worked well with dbx. Now that we have hc2.1y, we're not exactly seeing wonderfullness on the dbx front. Should we? Or do we need to pick up a new dbx? Richard Campbell
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!umich!terminator!rioja.ifs.umich.edu!ricShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!umich!terminator!rioja.ifs.umich.edu!ric From: ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: hc2.1y and dbx Keywords: dbx Message-ID: <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu> Date: 27 Feb 90 22:57:19 GMT Sender: usenet@terminator.cc.umich.edu (usenet news) Reply-To: ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell) Organization: University of Michigan, Institutional File System Project Lines: 10