Re: hc2.1y and dbx

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt

Article #1946

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Previous Next

#1946

From: Daniel Ehrlich
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 1990 18:35

19 lines
1332 bytes

In article <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu> ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell) writes:

Richard> At the Washington Usenix RT/AOS4.3 bof, it
Richard> was mentioned that hc2.1y was in very good shape
Richard> and that it worked well with dbx.

Richard> Now that we have hc2.1y, we're not exactly seeing
Richard> wonderfullness on the dbx front. Should we? Or do we
Richard> need to pick up a new dbx?

Which DBX are you using?  The dbx that came with the Sep/Dec 88 release or
the one issued by Eric Brunner as patch V1.15 parts 1 through 5?  The dbx
that came originaly was never very useful.  The new version is archived on
the host bikini.cis.ufl.edu [128.227.224.1] in the directory
pub/ibm-rt-fixes.

--
Dan Ehrlich <ehrlich@cs.psu.edu>
Voice: +1 814 863 1142	FAX: +1 814 865 3176

Technical Details

Message-ID: <E03gs81@cs.psu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!think!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!news

References: <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!think!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!news
From: ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Subject: Re: hc2.1y and dbx
Message-ID: <E03gs81@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 1 Mar 90 18:35:49 GMT
References: <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Organization: Computer Science Department, Penn State University
Lines: 19
In-Reply-To: ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu's message of 27 Feb 90 22:57:19 GMT

Reply to Parent Message