Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Article #315Re: AIX Peculiarities
From: Arthur Stine
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1989 19:39
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1989 19:39
35 lines
1585 bytes
1585 bytes
From article <2534@shaffer.UUCP>, by jon@shaffer.UUCP (Jon Doran/60000): > In article <16655@ut-emx.UUCP>, nghiem@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Alex Nghiem) writes: > >> Also, there is a lot to be said about the bottom line--the RT > ^^^^^^ >> has simply not sold as well as workstations produced by other > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> vendors. It should not be to hard to determine why. The RT > ^^^^^^^^ > > OK, so IBM is not winning any popularity contests. And I agree > that there is plenty of room for improvement... But IBM is > ranked 4th in workstation sales. I'm not sure if this is by > unit or by sales. > 1. HP (includes Apollo Div) > 2. Sun > 3. ??? > 4. IBM > the ??? would be DEC. The percentage of installed systems that I've seen mentioned in recent trade-rags in something like: 1 HP/Apollo = > 30% 2 Sun ~ 30% 3 DEC ~ 23% 4 IBM ~ 2% and then all the others. -- Art Stine Sr Network Engineer Clarkson U ABStine@CLVMS.Clarkson.Edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Sep5.193948.14894@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!image.soe.clarkson.edu!abstineReferences:
<2534@shaffer.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!image.soe.clarkson.edu!abstine From: abstine@image.soe.clarkson.edu (Arthur Stine) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: AIX Peculiarities Message-ID: <1989Sep5.193948.14894@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> Date: 5 Sep 89 19:39:48 GMT References: <2534@shaffer.UUCP> Sender: abstine@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Arthur Stine) Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY Lines: 36