🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <90Aug8.002720edt.7796@neat.cs.toronto.edu>
	 rayan@cs.toronto.edu (Rayan Zachariassen) writes:
>If you are aware of a gdb port for the RT (AOS), or a planned port of 4.3-Reno,
>could you please drop me a line?

I've been working on and off on gdb for a while now (nearly a year, but it
has been a low priority project).  I have something that almost works; I just
got some changes from someone that I have to merge into my sources, after which
it should be ready for wider testing.

I don't know of any official plans for a public 4.3-Reno port to the RT.  Note
the 2 qualifiers there: "official" and "public".  IBM has announced plans to
drop support for BSD unix.  The 2 biggest users of RTs (as far as I know) are
CMU and MIT/Athena.  CMU uses mach, and so isn't likely to work on BSD ports.
Athena uses BSD on RTs, but isn't in the business of porting kernels for
general distribution (we use too much restricted code) so don't expect to see
any kernel port from us.  Any changes we make to user code will get back to
Berkeley, so I would expect later 4.3 or 4.4 releases to compile and run on
the RT with the exception of the kernel.  (Footnotes to above: (1) Athena has
made no decision to run 4.3R or 4.4, so we make no guarantees that we will work
on porting; (2) I am currently rewriting the locore code for the RT kernel
because of bugs in the trap handlers; if I rewrite it entirely it might be
made public, but you would still need a lot of other files to have a kernel
free of IBM copyrights).


--
    --John Carr (jfc@athena.mit.edu)

In article <90Aug8.002720edt.7796@neat.cs.toronto.edu> rayan@cs.toronto.edu (Rayan Zachariassen) writes:
>If you are aware of a gdb port for the RT (AOS), or a planned port of 4.3-Reno,
>could you please drop me a line?

I use the 1.2 version of gdb. I've source for 3.2 and 3.5, but haven't done
the work necessary to run either of these 3.x versions on the RT running
IBM/4.3 (aka "AOS" or "ACIS"). Bill Catty (MIT) and others have mentioned
porting the 3.5 version, I don't think that the work has been completed yet.

As for a port-4.3 release, e.g., 4.3-Reno, IBM has already stated that it
is withdrawing support effective 22 December 1990, and may, if in IBM's
judgement it is warranted, issue a final PTM within the 3 month period
following termination of support. See my announcement posting last May if
you missed it.


Eric Brunner, Consultant, IBM AWD Palo Alto	(415) 855-4486
inet: brunner@monet.berkeley.edu		uucp: uunet!ibmsupt!brunner

trying to understand multiprocessing is like having bees live inside your head.