Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard.tech
Article #126Poor performance of Audigy LS?
From: Andy Evans
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:10
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:10
38 lines
3064 bytes
3064 bytes
The performance of my new Audigy LS card is very poor, even given its role as Creative's "lower-priced" card. Games like URU and Simpsons Hit & Run show noticeable slowness when the sound is enabled at its default settings. URU is virtually unplayable unless I turn off EAX and reduce the number of sounds to low or medium. I understand that this is not a true relative to the Audigy line of products, and that EAX (at least) is not hardware-accelerated on this card, plus I am using this on a low-end PC (1.4 Ghz Celeron, 640 MB, Win XP), but it still shouldn't be this bad, should it? In testing, Audio WinBench 99 (v 1.0.1) reports between 32% and 55% CPU utilization, depending on the severity of the test. RightMark 3D CPU utilization test reports between 20% and 40%. This seems unbelievably high! The one LS review I found, from a non-mainstream site, was seeing the expected 2-5% (which is what I get with my old Diamond MX-300 Aureal card), so I wonder if there's some incompatibility with my PC setup. I have tried turning off all non-essential tasks and background processes, with little improvement. I fully uninstalled and reinstalled the drivers, and saw little if any improvement. I also tried the recently released drivers, with no improvement. I've also tried removing some of my PCI cards, moving the Audigy to a new slot that sould lessen the need for sharing IRQs, as suggested by Creative Tech Support, and disabled every device except the Audigy and the video. (Although I do wonder whether turning off a device in the Device Manager is the same as removing the card from the slot...) I get some slight improvements, but still see the same problems in games, and get 20% or worse CPU utilization in all Audio WinBench 99 and RightMark 3D CPU utilization tests. Even basic, non-EAX tests show this, and even when the Audigy card IRQ is not shared with anything else. Are these consistent with any other owners' tests, or is there something that can fix this problem? Has anyone with this card run either or both of these benchmarks? If so, can you post your results?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bb2a3139.0403190810.6a9428c8@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd29b,33a0514920a7dd60,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd29b,public X-Google-Thread: 1021cd,33a0514920a7dd60,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1021cd,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-19 08:11:33 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: elric2176@evanses.com (Andy Evans) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard.tech,creative.products.sound_blaster.audigy Subject: Poor performance of Audigy LS? Date: 19 Mar 2004 08:10:45 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 38 Message-ID: <bb2a3139.0403190810.6a9428c8@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 161.88.255.139 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1079712645 25872 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2004 16:10:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:10:45 +0000 (UTC)