🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard
Article #3967

Re: Orchid Sound Producer/Pro

#3967
From: Phat H Tran
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 16:39
20 lines
1341 bytes
In article <C0JIx2.4CA@gabriel.keele.ac.uk> csd25@keele.ac.uk (C.M. Yearsley) writes:
[...]
>
>At the moment the choice seems to be Orchid or GUS and I don't like what I've
>heard of speed loss under GUS. How bad is it? I'd rather have the best
>performance from my software than the soundcard, if I have to sacrifice
>something.

The speed loss only occurs when using the GUS's SB emulation TSR.  In its
native mode, the GUS does not cause a performance penalty.  In fact,
because of its wavetable chip, the GUS can take care of a lot of the
processing when playing music that relies on sampled sounds, such as
MODs.  In a game that uses MOD music, such as Star Control II, machines
with the GUS run the game much faster than machines with only SBs or
SBPros.

Is the Orchid a wavetable/wavesample card?  If not, it will sound *much*
inferior to the GUS.

Phat.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <C0JnLr.3J4@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!sciborg.uwaterloo.ca!ptran
References: <C0JIx2.4CA@gabriel.keele.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!sciborg.uwaterloo.ca!ptran
From: ptran@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Phat H Tran)
Subject: Re: Orchid Sound Producer/Pro
Message-ID: <C0JnLr.3J4@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca>
Sender: news@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca
Organization: University of Waterloo
References: <C0JIx2.4CA@gabriel.keele.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:39:26 GMT
Lines: 20