Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard
Article #3967Re: Orchid Sound Producer/Pro
From: Phat H Tran
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 16:39
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 16:39
20 lines
1341 bytes
1341 bytes
In article <C0JIx2.4CA@gabriel.keele.ac.uk> csd25@keele.ac.uk (C.M. Yearsley) writes: [...] > >At the moment the choice seems to be Orchid or GUS and I don't like what I've >heard of speed loss under GUS. How bad is it? I'd rather have the best >performance from my software than the soundcard, if I have to sacrifice >something. The speed loss only occurs when using the GUS's SB emulation TSR. In its native mode, the GUS does not cause a performance penalty. In fact, because of its wavetable chip, the GUS can take care of a lot of the processing when playing music that relies on sampled sounds, such as MODs. In a game that uses MOD music, such as Star Control II, machines with the GUS run the game much faster than machines with only SBs or SBPros. Is the Orchid a wavetable/wavesample card? If not, it will sound *much* inferior to the GUS. Phat.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0JnLr.3J4@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!sciborg.uwaterloo.ca!ptranReferences:
<C0JIx2.4CA@gabriel.keele.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!sciborg.uwaterloo.ca!ptran From: ptran@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Phat H Tran) Subject: Re: Orchid Sound Producer/Pro Message-ID: <C0JnLr.3J4@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca> Sender: news@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca Organization: University of Waterloo References: <C0JIx2.4CA@gabriel.keele.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:39:26 GMT Lines: 20