Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by sl859
Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:08
JJ is gone
Author: sl859
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:08
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:08
10 lines
832 bytes
832 bytes
Well It is official. Josh Jensen is no longer reachable at sl8nl@cc.usu.edu so don't send him any more mail there. If you gotta reach him, until we can get him a new account, please send messages to SL859@CC.USU.EDU. I have set a directory aside for him to use, off of my account. Soo... Any comments of GUSMOD or Renesaince can be sent to me and I will save them for him to read. OK? wReam... P.S. Right now the Crisis is 386 assembler... Is it worth rewriting the thing in extended mode?
Re: JJ is gone
Author: Ron Dippold
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:54
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:54
7 lines
765 bytes
765 bytes
sl859@cc.usu.edu writes: >P.S. Right now the Crisis is 386 assembler... Is it worth rewriting the thing >in extended mode? What is it doing that requires so much CPU speed? A spectrum analyzer? -- A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems.
Re: JJ is gone and 386 stuff
Author: sl859
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 23:33
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 23:33
13 lines
1066 bytes
1066 bytes
Totally off subject, but very relevant. How do people feel about Renaissance's demos... the reboot sequence? Just curious, because in solid protected mode, we have access to ALL of your computer's memory and capabilities and don't have to go through XMS. This means that we can write some SWEET games for you guys!!! (We already are...details later. Put it this way, we wrote a Wolf3d-like full screen engine in just a few hours...Tran should have full texture mapping (any angles) very soon...) What can we do to improve it? Joshua Jensen CyberStrike of Renaissance Mail all replies to sl859@cc.usu.edu until further notice.
Re: JJ is gone and 386 stuff
Author: Eric Hsiao
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 01:00
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 01:00
20 lines
1433 bytes
1433 bytes
In article <1993Jan26.173356.63223@cc.usu.edu> sl859@cc.usu.edu writes: > >What can we do to improve it? > >Joshua Jensen >CyberStrike of Renaissance > Add PAS-16 16-bit stereo support. Why? Because, the DAC is cleaner and less noisy than the SB Pro's and it has 16-bit stereo support. Sure, the Gravis is a really nice card and it's wavetable synth blows away FM, but there are still alot of PAS owners out there (more than GUS right now). Also, have you heard about the Mediavision Shareware contest? You can win $5000, $2000, $1000, or $100. Write something for the PAS-16 and make some money! -- | Internet: hsiaoe@rpi.edu > Read GIF News - a freely copied news < | | Bitnet: userHA6G@rpitsmts.bitnet > magazine in .GIF file format. Color < | | To get GIF News, FTP to here: > articles on reviews of programs, < | | netserv1.its.rpi.edu /pub/misc > games, industry news, IBM, Amiga, etc.< |
Re: JJ is gone and 386 stuff
Author: Ron Dippold
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:32
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:32
11 lines
1141 bytes
1141 bytes
sl859@cc.usu.edu writes: >Totally off subject, but very relevant. How do people feel about Renaissance's >demos... the reboot sequence? Just curious, because in solid protected mode, >we have access to ALL of your computer's memory and capabilities and don't have >to go through XMS. This means that we can write some SWEET games for you The demos are cool. I don't mind rebooting with another configuration. I _DO_ mind something that goes and plays with my CONFIG.SYS file. Let me do that myself. -- Just roll me under the table and let me sleep it off. -- George Bush
Re: JJ is gone and 386 stuff
Author: Anssi Saari
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 10:52
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 10:52
20 lines
1472 bytes
1472 bytes
In <1993Jan26.173356.63223@cc.usu.edu> sl859@cc.usu.edu writes: >Totally off subject, but very relevant. How do people feel about Renaissance's >demos... the reboot sequence? Just curious, because in solid protected mode, >we have access to ALL of your computer's memory and capabilities and don't have >to go through XMS. This means that we can write some SWEET games for you >guys!!! (We already are...details later. Put it this way, we wrote a >Wolf3d-like full screen engine in just a few hours...Tran should have full >texture mapping (any angles) very soon...) >What can we do to improve it? Make it work with Qemm like civilized protected mode programs do, Matlab or Autocad for example. Anssi -- Anssi Saari s106275@ee.tut.fi Tampere University of Technology Finland, Europe
Re: JJ is gone and 386 stuff
Author: sl859
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:23
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:23
17 lines
1192 bytes
1192 bytes
>>What can we do to improve it? > > Make it work with Qemm like civilized protected mode programs do, Matlab or > Autocad for example. If a program works with Qemm or Emm386, then it isn't a protected mode program, just takes advantage of it. Why? A true protected mode program takes complete control of protected mode and doesn't rely on a driver like Qemm to access it for it. Too bad, but it's true...if we use these Expanded Memory Managers...as an example, I had a game that was running from 60 fps and I started swapping to and from XMS...the game slowed down to 16 fps. Joshua Jensen CyberStrike of Renaissance cstrike@gompers.gompers.edu <-- New Internet address
Re: JJ is gone and 386 stuff
Author: Tim Triemstra
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 01:15
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 01:15
34 lines
2146 bytes
2146 bytes
In <1993Jan27.152342.63264@cc.usu.edu>, sl859@cc.usu.edu wrote: >Too bad, but it's true...if we use these Expanded Memory Managers...as an >example, I had a game that was running from 60 fps and I started swapping to >and from XMS...the game slowed down to 16 fps. >cstrike@gompers.gompers.edu <-- New Internet address Glad you got an address there Josh. Welp, there are programs that con override the memory manager, or detect what type of memory manager is present and just go right over the top. I know the DOS extender that I use will detect the presence of a DPMI host and work under it (if it has no choice like under OS/2) but it can also work just fine with NO memory manager whatsoever. I haven't really done a benchmark test on it to compare a with/without QEMM yet though. I'll do that after I'm done with my mail. But I do know I get 54 fps on my 486/33 in 320x200x256 *FROM MEMORY, NOT HIDDEN PAGE* while working under QEMM, so I'd have to assume that the QEMM is bypassed. I have ALOT of information on this DOS exteder (more than you'd ever get when buying a compiler as I'm in pretty good with the authors) and if you'd like the info just let me know. I'm still having some mail trouble so please respond if you'd like it somewhere (and so I can know you're getting my mail.) Take it easy. Tim. ------------------------------------------------------- | When the end comes, there will be two men standing: | | Me, and the guy I gotta kill. - Gosh I'm EVIL | ------ Tim Triemstra ------------- empath@ais.org -----
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads