Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #13438Re: MFM -- RLL drive
From: David Mason
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 1990 16:21
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 1990 16:21
13 lines
984 bytes
984 bytes
pdwalker@bcarh471.bnr.ca (Paul D Walker) writes: > PS: by the way. If you are crammed up at 70meg of disk space, then the > extra 30 meg you will fill up in a short order. :) Thanks for the comments. Yes, I'm well aware that the more disk space I have,the more data that will mysteriously appear. However, I just want room for my major applications, I don't mind swapping data so much. But we do have a point of disagrement. A previous message stated that drives older than two years were better for RLLing (if they were certified for MFM, but not tested for RLL). You claim that newer drives are better. I don't think this one can be resolved though, because you both have points.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xae5P2w162w@zooid.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!dciem!nttor!contact!zooid!dveReferences:
<3368@bnr-rsc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!dciem!nttor!contact!zooid!dve From: dve@zooid.UUCP (David Mason) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: MFM -- RLL drive Message-ID: <Xae5P2w162w@zooid.UUCP> Date: 26 Sep 90 16:21:44 GMT References: <3368@bnr-rsc.UUCP> Organization: here Lines: 13