Re: DOS 3.2

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #14616

#14616

From: brown
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1986 15:36

18 lines
1456 bytes

In article <855@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> pre1@sphinx.UUCP (Grant A. Prellwitz) writes:
>In article <1157@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> melvinc@sim.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Melvin Chan) writes:
>>I'm considering upgrading to DOS version 3.2; can someone tell me
>>the major differences between DOS 3.1 and 3.2?  Thanks!
>
>The major differences that I have found are the following bugs:
>DOS3.2 restore doesn't seem to work.  Therefore the entire backup/restore
>  package isn't distributed with the system.

I have been using PC-DOS 3.20 for quite awhile now, and Backup/Restore,
using 5.25" 360K diskettes, works just fine.  Never a problem.
-- 
	   ihnp4------\				|------------------------|
	 harvard-\     \			|        terminus:       |
Mr. Video   seismo!uwvax!nicmad!brown		| The clearing house for |
	   topaz-/     /			|     rec.arts.drwho     |
	  decvax------/				|------------------------|
	terminus-----/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1345@nicmad.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!brown

References: <1157@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> <855@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!brown
From: brown@nicmad.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: DOS 3.2
Message-ID: <1345@nicmad.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Dec-86 10:36:59 EST
Article-I.D.: nicmad.1345
Posted: Tue Dec  2 10:36:59 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Dec-86 20:24:50 EST
References: <1157@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> <855@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Reply-To: brown@nicmad.UUCP (Mr. Video)
Organization: Nicolet Instrument Corp. Madison WI
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message