Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #15047Re: Mainframes vs micros for database applications
From: Mike Taylor
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1987 04:59
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1987 04:59
18 lines
1460 bytes
1460 bytes
In article <13905@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>, jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) writes:
>
> One problem with mainframe databases is that IBM's main offering,
> IMS, is single-thread.
This is simply not true. Much of the rest of the article, which is a
paean to Tandem's systems, is true. However, one should not overlook
the compromises which Tandem makes in important areas such as "hot spot"
and batch support. I am aware of IMS systems, BTW, in which 40+ large systems
are coupled via ISC to support a single large application. Tandem makes
a good product which has enjoyed deserved success in suitable applications.
It is not, however, the answer to every problem.
--
Mike Taylor ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,sun}!amdahl!mat
[ This may not reflect my opinion, let alone anyone else's. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4944@amdahl.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!cit-vax!amdahl!matReferences:
<653@imsvax.UUCP> <196@unisoft.UUCP> <2839@gitpyr.gatech.EDU> <13905@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!cit-vax!amdahl!mat From: mat@amdahl.UUCP (Mike Taylor) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Mainframes vs micros for database applications Message-ID: <4944@amdahl.UUCP> Date: Sat, 3-Jan-87 23:59:01 EST Article-I.D.: amdahl.4944 Posted: Sat Jan 3 23:59:01 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 4-Jan-87 04:36:08 EST References: <653@imsvax.UUCP> <196@unisoft.UUCP> <2839@gitpyr.gatech.EDU> <13905@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> Organization: Amdahl Corp, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 18 Keywords: databases, mainframes, Tandem, IBM