AT Clones: Anybody Been BURNED ?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #15731

#15731

From: scott
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1987 17:21

18 lines
1013 bytes

    Has anyone had bad experiences with an AT clone or
    its distributor ? 
    Have you any indication that your brand might not run
    Microport V/AT ?



All these AT clones seem similar. 
I'm considering only cheap clones ($1k +-$500 for base unit),
so I suspect all of them are made by only a few manufacturers.

If there is enough interest, I'll post results to the net.

Thanks in advance !
-- 
	   Scott Crenshaw		{akgua,decvax}!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!scott
	   SCI Systems , Inc. 		Research Triangle Park, NC

Technical Details

Message-ID: <806@scirtp.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cuae2!gatech!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!scott

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cuae2!gatech!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!scott
From: scott@scirtp.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: AT Clones: Anybody Been BURNED ?
Message-ID: <806@scirtp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Feb-87 12:21:42 EST
Article-I.D.: scirtp.806
Posted: Fri Feb 13 12:21:42 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Feb-87 23:14:04 EST
Organization: SCI Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lines: 18