Re: PROCOMM question

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #15756

#15756

From: wmf
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1987 17:21

25 lines
1337 bytes

In article <589@rna.UUCP> dan@rna.UUCP (Dan Ts'o) writes:
>
>	Sorry if this has been covered...
>
>However I found that I could not get the KERMIT protocol to work. 

PROCOMM requires the host kermit have it's parity reset to function properly.

The consensus on the net was SET PARITY EVEN, but I have had the best luck 
with SET PARITY MARK.

If you are dealing with a binary file, both PROCOMM and the host kermit have
to be told this;

PROCOMM is set via the <ALT> S (setup) command and the host uses a SET FILE
TYPE BINARY command.

Regards,

-- 
             ====================================================  
             |    Fortiter in re,       ||     Bill Fischer     |
             |       suaviter in modo.  ||  ...ihnp4!chinet!wmf |
             ====================================================

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1028@chinet.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!chinet!wmf

References: <589@rna.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!chinet!wmf
From: wmf@chinet.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: PROCOMM question
Message-ID: <1028@chinet.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-Jan-87 12:21:49 EST
Article-I.D.: chinet.1028
Posted: Fri Jan 16 12:21:49 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Jan-87 07:01:42 EST
References: <589@rna.UUCP>
Reply-To: wmf@chinet.UUCP (William M. Fischer)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 25

Reply to Parent Message