Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #25657Re: NEC Multisync Plus misfeature
From: john
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 1988 21:15
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 1988 21:15
13 lines
968 bytes
968 bytes
>
> On a separate note, our original Multiscan has been performing well in
^^^^^^^^^
> 800 by 600 mode, even though it's not rated for that resolution. Should
> I expect damage to result from this "misuse", or are the claims about
> these monitors not working in 800 by 600 mode based purely on the specs?
>
Is this a typo or are you really talking about the Sony MultiScan and
not the Nec MultiSync? I ask because the rest of the article is primarily
about the display resolution of Nec monitors.
john
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<258@bby-bc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!oddjob!gargoyle!att-ih!alberta!ubc-cs!fornax!bby-bc!johnReferences:
<1686@bgsuvax.UUCP> <510@wintek.UUCP> <710@netxcom.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!oddjob!gargoyle!att-ih!alberta!ubc-cs!fornax!bby-bc!john From: john@bby-bc.UUCP (john) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: NEC Multisync Plus misfeature Message-ID: <258@bby-bc.UUCP> Date: 12 Mar 88 21:15:41 GMT References: <1686@bgsuvax.UUCP> <510@wintek.UUCP> <710@netxcom.UUCP> Distribution: comp.sys.ibm.pc Organization: Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada Lines: 13