Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #25788Re: NO MODERATOR, JUST A NEW NEWSGROUP
From: Brad Transue
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 1988 17:40
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 1988 17:40
26 lines
1733 bytes
1733 bytes
In article <2410@utah-gr.UUCP>, u-pgardi%sunset.utah.edu@utah-gr.UUCP (Phillip Garding) writes:
>The logical solution to everyone's problems, I think is to leave comp.binaries
>UNmoderated, and create a new group for discussion: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d.
>Phil.
MOVED to comp.sys.ibm.pc, it doesn't belong in comp.binaries.ibm.pc
I think the summary says it all.
Make 1 group (IF WE REALLY MUST MAKE ANOTHER GROUP!)
that would service all binary groups. Like I stated before, there
is only 1 comp.sources.d, not comp.sources.games.d,
comp.sources.unix.d........:-)
PS: If you want to argue about having a separate group to avoid
having to WADE through all the OTHER computer(s) postings, I
suggest you look at the LACK of non-binary postings in those
groups. THERE AREN'T ANY BECAUSE THEY ARE MODERATED!
I think a common discussion group might fare beter with
the net admins, and would give the other brand(s) computer users
some benifit also.
Mail all FLAMES to me, don't tie up the net. All other useful
items accepted also.
--
Brad Transue UUCP: {rutgers,ihnp4}!bpa!vu-vlsi!lehi3b15!t9103!transue
or: transue@t9103.UUCP
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<228@t9103.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!psuvax1!burdvax!bpa!cbmvax!vu-vlsi!lehi3b15!t9103!transueReferences:
<235400004@prism> <235400005@prism> <2963@pbhyf.UUCP> <2410@utah-gr.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!psuvax1!burdvax!bpa!cbmvax!vu-vlsi!lehi3b15!t9103!transue From: transue@t9103.UUCP (Brad Transue) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: NO MODERATOR, JUST A NEW NEWSGROUP Message-ID: <228@t9103.UUCP> Date: 19 Mar 88 17:40:36 GMT References: <235400004@prism> <235400005@prism> <2963@pbhyf.UUCP> <2410@utah-gr.UUCP> Organization: Home, Walnutport PA Lines: 26 Summary: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d, possibly usefull, however maybe it should be comp.binaries.d. After all it's only comp.sources.d!