🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <600@gtx.com> scm@gtx.UUCP (Sue Miller) writes:
< Mike Berger says:
<
<>CGASIM is incompatible with a lot of things.  A Hercules card
<>isn't really a good substitute for a CGA.  If you want to get
<>something that you can use with a CGA or monochrome monitor now,
<>the ATI wonder card may not be the way to go.  There have
<>been a lot of complaints about incompatibilities in various
<>displayy mode/monitor combinations.  Consider the Paradise
<>Autoswitch 480, in the same price range, instead.
<
< Hmmm, in my opinion CGA is a poor substitute for Hercules.  In any
<case, the newest version of SIMCGA works very much better than the
<original version.  I haven't much use for it, since I rarely run
<s/w that requires such, but I did notice that the new one crashes
<very little compared to the old.  
<
< I very much cherish the resolution that I get with a mono graphics
<card, and am not too terribly impressed with any but the very most
<expensive color cards (VGA+ is almost as good as herc) -- so here you
<see how very different 2 users' requirements can be...

There are *some* Hercules clones out there that beat this problem. 
At work our current standard mono card is the MG-150 from DTI (I've
also heard it reffered to by our vendor as an "LTI or el-tek" card
(spelling unknown!)).

This card comes with a program that serves the same function as the
HGC program for the Hercules cards (ie setting FULL, HALKF & DIAG)
a diagnostic program(!) and a color simulator program. The card apparently
has an extra mode used by this software as it *only* works properly with
their card. But the results are amazing. It looked *better* than a CGA
card driving a mono monitor!!! No flicker either.

I have no connection with this company other than as a satisfied 
customer...
-- 
Leonard Erickson		...!tektronix!reed!percival!bucket!leonard
CIS: [70465,203]
"I used to be a hacker. Now I'm a 'microcomputer specialist'.
You know... I'd rather be a hacker."