Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #26199Binaries: ARC vs PKARC vs ZOO
From: Eugene Tramaglino
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 1988 18:55
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 1988 18:55
15 lines
1480 bytes
1480 bytes
I think that I would have no major objection to using ZOO as an archive format, IF it (the ZOO program) was made available IN ADVANCE of standardizing. Why can't we simply send everyone a copy of ZOO? Note: I have not used ZOO. I have used ARC and pkarc. Personal Note: I cannot stand pkarc. I prefer ARC's one (1) program that does the job just as well. I don't like invoking different commands to 'v' an archive and 'e' an archive. #==============================================#=========================# # Eugene Tramaglino -- tlhingan@unsvax.uns.edu # USS Mahagonny, NCC-1929 # # 1450 E Harmon 207A, Las Vegas, NV 89119 #=========================# # Data: "All paths are equally dangerous." # Member, Institute of # # Riker: "Let's go!" # General Semantics. # #==============================================#=========================#
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<230@unsvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!umix!umich!mibte!gamma!ulysses!thumper!faline!bellcore!tness7!petro!swrinde!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!stride!tahoe!unsvax!tlhinganReferences:
<23699@clyde.ATT.COM> <1805@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <1685@polyslo.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!umix!umich!mibte!gamma!ulysses!thumper!faline!bellcore!tness7!petro!swrinde!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!stride!tahoe!unsvax!tlhingan From: tlhingan@unsvax.UUCP (Eugene Tramaglino) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Binaries: ARC vs PKARC vs ZOO Message-ID: <230@unsvax.UUCP> Date: 3 Apr 88 18:55:12 GMT References: <23699@clyde.ATT.COM> <1805@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <1685@polyslo.UUCP> Reply-To: tlhingan@unsvax.uucp (Eugene Tramaglino) Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Center Lines: 14