Re: pd vi

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #26474

#26474

From: Larry Autry
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 1988 02:52

18 lines
1036 bytes

In article <141900026@occrsh.ATT.COM>, david@squid.UUCP writes:
< 
< (stuff deleted)    I have two pd implementations of vi, both of which are
< very obviously not commercial (by their limitations and bugs).
< (more deleted).
< David Drexler
< 
<   uucp: ihnp4!occrsh!squid!david   FidoNet: 1:19/1
<   data: +1 405 728-2463 (2400bps)  voice:   +1 405 848-8868
<   .

I would much rather get free pd bugs than have to pay for them.  Such as those
that exist in my non-pd version of a vi editor.  
-- 
					Larry Autry
larry@sgistl.sgi.com
       or
{ucbvax,sun,ames,pryamid,decwrl}!sgi!sgistl!larry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5594@sgistl.SGI.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!sgi!sgistl!larry

References: <141900026@occrsh.ATT.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!sgi!sgistl!larry
From: larry@sgistl.SGI.COM (Larry Autry)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: pd vi
Summary: pd bugs vs commercial bugs
Message-ID: <5594@sgistl.SGI.COM>
Date: 17 Apr 88 02:52:44 GMT
References: <141900026@occrsh.ATT.COM>
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mt.View, CA., St.Louis Ofc.
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message