Re: pd vi

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #26488

#26488

From: Matt Harding
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 1988 06:04

17 lines
895 bytes

In article <141900026@occrsh.ATT.COM> david@squid.UUCP writes:
>You are incorrect. I have two pd implementations of vi, both of which are
>very obviously not commercial (by their limitations and bugs).
>
>The net is so lucky to have a pd software expert who knows about everything
>that exists in the world. Please, sir, may I have a catalog?
>

Alright! Now that's an authentic flame if I've ever seen one!



Well done!!!



  -  Flamers of North America

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6460@watdragon.waterloo.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watdragon!dahlia!mdharding

References: <141900026@occrsh.ATT.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watdragon!dahlia!mdharding
From: mdharding@dahlia.waterloo.edu (Matt Harding)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: pd vi
Message-ID: <6460@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Date: 19 Apr 88 06:04:54 GMT
References: <141900026@occrsh.ATT.COM>
Sender: daemon@watdragon.waterloo.edu
Reply-To: mdharding@dahlia.waterloo.edu (Matt Harding)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message