Re: Comparison of compaction routines

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #26724

#26724

From: rce229
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 1988 21:14

5 lines
728 bytes

I know of many people who complain that PKARC with its 13-bit
"Squash" method should not be used due to the extra memory required
(over the normal 12-bit method).  How much memory does the Compress
port require?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <111700006@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!rce229

References: <483@csccat.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!rce229
From: rce229@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Comparison of compaction routines
Message-ID: <111700006@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 25 Apr 88 21:14:00 GMT
References: <483@csccat.UUCP>
Lines: 5
Nf-ID: #R:csccat.UUCP:483:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:111700006:000:226
Nf-From: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!rce229    Apr 25 16:14:00 1988

Reply to Parent Message