🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #40990

AT waitstates

#40990
From: Dave Emmerson
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 1990 11:22
15 lines
888 bytes
Hi netters!
A question for the techies..

A colleague asked me to enquire what experiences other designers have had
with AT interface designs. Specifically, did you adhere to 1 wait state 
in 16 bit mode, 4 wait states in 8 bit mode (as per IBM refernce manual) ?
If so, what IO access times did you get for a 12.5 MHz clock?


E-mail replies are preferred for this one, he's not a regular reader, but
he can have access to my mailbox.

advTHANXance

Dave E. (pp Chris)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <347@marvin.moncam.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!acorn!moncam!emmo

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!acorn!moncam!emmo
From: emmo@moncam.co.uk (Dave Emmerson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: AT waitstates
Keywords: HARDWARE WAITSTATES TIMING AT
Message-ID: <347@marvin.moncam.co.uk>
Date: 5 Jan 90 11:22:21 GMT
Organization: Monotype ADG, Cambridge, UK
Lines: 15