Re: hard disk de-fragmenter

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #40995

#40995

From: Duncan Murdoch
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1990 13:44

14 lines
1161 bytes

In article <S1CC8HW@drivax.UUCP> liberato@drivax.UUCP (Jimmy Liberato) writes:
>
>It is interesting to pit the various "deframenters" against each other.
...
>I have no recommendations to make because I don't think they are all that
>important (unless your hardrive is a real slug).

Besides speeding up your disk, remember that defraggers make it much easier
to recover from accidental erasures - if a file is contiguous when you
erase it, unerasing it is a breeze.  If it's got fragments all over the place,
you don't have much chance at all, unless your utility stores extra information
the way Norton's Format Recover does.

Duncan Murdoch

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1097@maytag.waterloo.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!maytag!watstat!dmurdoch

References: <90004.231733MHS108@PSUVM.BITNET> <538@tuura.UUCP> <S1CC8HW@drivax.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!maytag!watstat!dmurdoch
From: dmurdoch@watstat.waterloo.edu (Duncan Murdoch)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: hard disk de-fragmenter
Message-ID: <1097@maytag.waterloo.edu>
Date: 8 Jan 90 13:44:45 GMT
References: <90004.231733MHS108@PSUVM.BITNET> <538@tuura.UUCP> <S1CC8HW@drivax.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@maytag.waterloo.edu
Reply-To: dmurdoch@watstat.waterloo.edu (Duncan Murdoch)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message