🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3288@plains.UUCP>, harlow@plains.UUCP (Jay B. Harlow) wrote:
}In article <40970040@hpindda.HP.COM> kmont@hpindda.HP.COM (Kevin Montgomery)
}writes:
}>> This is because your computer most probably does not decode address line
}>> A20 (at least in real mode). If you want to access the addresses beyond
}>> 1M you got to turn A20 ON implicitly. 
}>
}  Certain Companies when they released thier NEW 286 Intel machine, for
}a follow up to thier popular PC machine, decided they NEEDED to 
}mimick it in EVERY aspect. Including the 1M limit wrap around
}( i.e. address FFFF:0010 wraps to 0000:0000 ) at least being 'smart' and 

Probably because a Certain OS Company actually *used* the 1M wraparound....
(the CP/M-compatible "CALL 5" entry point jumps to 000C0h, but is
constrained on HOW it jumps there by the need for PSP:0006h to be the
size of the first segment. That's how CP/M programs determined how much
space they had, since the jump instruction at location 5 on a CP/M
machine goes to the lowest byte of the OS, which is the next byte after
the last byte available to the program)

--
UUCP: {ucbvax,harvard}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf -=- 412-268-3053 (school) -=- FAX: ask
ARPA: ralf@cs.cmu.edu  BIT: ralf%cs.cmu.edu@CMUCCVMA  FIDO: Ralf Brown 1:129/46
"How to Prove It" by Dana Angluin              Disclaimer? I claimed something?
14. proof by importance:
    A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in
    question.