Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #41618DOS 4.01 and SHARE.EXE
From: Jason Deines
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1990 22:50
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1990 22:50
16 lines
1209 bytes
1209 bytes
I've always been puzzled as to why DOS 4.01 insists on having SHARE.EXE loaded when dealing with large partitions. All it says in the manual is something to the effect that "SHARE must be loaded, or unpredictable behavior will result". Thing is, I've had people tell me that's a lot of nonsense, and that they've run without SHARE for months with no problem at all. If that's true, I've got a related question: how do you stop DOS from sqawking at you about the lack of SHARE at bootup time? Would someone please enlighten me? Thanks. Jason Deines Academic Information Resources roller@jessica.stanford.edu Sweet Hall, Third Floor (415) 723-1055 Stanford, CA 94305
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1232@shelby.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!shelby!jessica!rollerShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!shelby!jessica!roller From: roller@jessica.Stanford.EDU (Jason Deines) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: DOS 4.01 and SHARE.EXE Summary: Why? Message-ID: <1232@shelby.Stanford.EDU> Date: 4 Feb 90 22:50:37 GMT Sender: news@shelby.Stanford.EDU Reply-To: roller@jessica.Stanford.EDU (Jason Deines) Organization: Stanford University Lines: 16