Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #41742Re: EMS Emulation - Query on QEMM
From: Doug Matlock
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 02:47
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 02:47
18 lines
1254 bytes
1254 bytes
In article <875@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM>, gary@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM (Gary Barrett) writes: > > I'm interested in hearing from anyone using QEMM. What are the pluses > and the "gotchas". I have been using QEMM and DESQview on a Compaq 386 for several months. We are developing a turnkey system and the client didn't want to spring for the necessary RAM for OS/2. I think QEMM is great. The only real gotchas are that you have to be a fairly dedicated hardware-head to set up the system properly. Much tweaking can be done by loading some drivers and TSRs into high memory (though not all will like it up there -- gotcha) but the problem is that most of the high memory area is largely undocumented, and each PC vendor has "special" things living up there. -- Doug. "If you want Peace, work for Justice."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5891@ozdaltx.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!attctc!ozdaltx!dougReferences:
<875@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!attctc!ozdaltx!doug From: doug@ozdaltx.UUCP (Doug Matlock) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: EMS Emulation - Query on QEMM Keywords: QEMM EMS Message-ID: <5891@ozdaltx.UUCP> Date: 6 Feb 90 02:47:15 GMT References: <875@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM> Distribution: na Organization: OZ BBS - Dallas, TX Lines: 18