Re: MFM as an RLL drive?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #41973

#41973

From: Brent Besler
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1990 17:56

3 lines
655 bytes

In bith my and a friends experience, WD RLL cards are easier on MFM drives than
Adaptecs.  The Adaptecs seem to be more prone to read errors.
					   Brent H. Besler

Technical Details

Message-ID: <429@egrunix.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!umich!wsu-cs!egrunix!besler

References: <90011904272373@masnet.uucp< <MLM.90Jan21115353@hector.cs.brown.edu< <272@fornax.UUCP> <455@sixhub.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!umich!wsu-cs!egrunix!besler
From: besler@egrunix.UUCP (Brent Besler)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: MFM as an RLL drive?
Message-ID: <429@egrunix.UUCP>
Date: 8 Feb 90 17:56:51 GMT
References: <90011904272373@masnet.uucp< <MLM.90Jan21115353@hector.cs.brown.edu< <272@fornax.UUCP> <455@sixhub.UUCP>
Reply-To: besler@unix.secs.oakland.edu.UUCP (Brent Besler)
Distribution: na
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester, MI
Lines: 3

Reply to Parent Message