Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #42354Re: 386Phoenix BIOS question
From: Ralf.Brown
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1990 22:17
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1990 22:17
17 lines
1358 bytes
1358 bytes
In article <40970045@hpindda.HP.COM>, huilin@hpindda.HP.COM (Hui-Lin Lim) wrote:
}In a recent issue of InfoWorld, Steve Gibson wrote that he
}upgraded his systems to 386s and that with Phoenix BIOS you can
}disable the first 32K (f000-f800) so that 386Max (presumeably
}QEMM) can use that as high DOS memory. Does anyone know if this
}is true for all 386 versions of the Phoenix BIOS?
True for the 1.10 10a version shipped by Gateway 2000. Runs just fine here
with the EMS frame from E800 to F7FF (overlapping the first 32K of the BIOS).
--
UUCP: {ucbvax,harvard}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf -=- 412-268-3053 (school) -=- FAX: ask
ARPA: ralf@cs.cmu.edu BIT: ralf%cs.cmu.edu@CMUCCVMA FIDO: Ralf Brown 1:129/46
"How to Prove It" by Dana Angluin Disclaimer? I claimed something?
14. proof by importance:
A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in
question.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<25d4a11a@ralf>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!usc!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDUShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!usc!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU From: Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: 386Phoenix BIOS question Message-ID: <25d4a11a@ralf> Date: 10 Feb 90 22:17:46 GMT Sender: ralf@b.gp.cs.cmu.edu Organization: Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science Lines: 17 In-Reply-To: <40970045@hpindda.HP.COM>