Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #42456Re: What monitor dot pitch ?
From: Flint Pellett
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1990 22:35
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1990 22:35
17 lines
1353 bytes
1353 bytes
I'd definately return the .52 monitor. Whether you want the .41 or .31 prolly depends on how much you want to spend and what resolution you want. You can get monitors with .26 dot pitch now (Seiko CM-1440, around $600-$700 w/ 1024x768 resolution interlaced, in a 14" monitor). Most of the decent monitors in that resolution are .31 dot pitch, and larger monitors in the 20" size are almost always .31 dot pitch. I suspect you aren't looking for anything that expensive/high-res though, but I do know that you will be able to tell the difference between the .41 and the .31 when you see them: it will be worth your time to check out the price differences and see if you can afford the better one if you really care about the picture quality. -- Flint Pellett, Global Information Systems Technology, Inc. 1800 Woodfield Drive, Savoy, IL 61874 (217) 352-1165 INTERNET: flint%gistdev@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu UUCP: uunet!gistdev!flint
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<887@gistdev.gist.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!gistdev!flintReferences:
<14790@cs.yale.edu> <9524@masscomp.ccur.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!gistdev!flint From: flint@gistdev.gist.com (Flint Pellett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: What monitor dot pitch ? Message-ID: <887@gistdev.gist.com> Date: 14 Feb 90 22:35:53 GMT References: <14790@cs.yale.edu> <9524@masscomp.ccur.com> Organization: Global Information Systems Technology Inc., Savoy, IL Lines: 17