🚀 go-pugleaf

> I'm concerned that such a compiler would be bigger and probably
> slower than a C-only compiler. In other words, I want
> the best, smallest, fastest C compiler Borland can
> make. Although I'm not interested in C++ I know that many other
> people are and that's why Borland should include 2 compilers
> in TC3.0, a C only compiler and a C++ compiler that presumably
> will also compile C.

Borland's C compiler is currently the fastest (in compile times) on the
market.  I, for one, am interested in learning C++.  However, I agree with
your concern over loss of speed.  I have faith in Borland they will produce
an efficient compiler, and integrate the two well.  I don't know if it's
necessary to separate the programs, although it may be a viable alternative to
slow compilation.  We'll just have to wait and see.

Eric

 ProLine: elund@pro-graphics
    UUCP: ...crash!pro-graphics!elund
ARPA/DDN: pro-graphics!elund@nosc.mil
Internet: elund@pro-graphics.cts.com