Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #42868Re: C&T NEAT chipset problems
From: David Hinds
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 20:13
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 20:13
13 lines
1008 bytes
1008 bytes
In article <29251@amdcad.AMD.COM>, phil@pepsi.amd.com writes:
>
> Are there other chip sets which are known to not be so wasteful
> of RAM?
>
The Intel/Zymos chipset for 386SX's allows full use of the memory
from 640K to 1M. It supports shadow memory, but I turn that off and
let QEMM handle it because I can more precisely control the areas that
are shadowed that way. I have 2M memory installed, with 640K conventional
and 1408K extended. The chipset wastes nothing.
- David Hinds
dhinds@popserver.stanford.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9440@portia.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!decwrl!shelby!portia!dhindsReferences:
<29251@amdcad.AMD.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!decwrl!shelby!portia!dhinds From: dhinds@portia.Stanford.EDU (David Hinds) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: C&T NEAT chipset problems Message-ID: <9440@portia.Stanford.EDU> Date: 22 Feb 90 20:13:32 GMT References: <29251@amdcad.AMD.COM> Sender: David Hinds <dhinds@portia.stanford.edu> Organization: Stanford University Lines: 13