Re: C&T NEAT chipset problems

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #42961

#42961

From: Ross Bannerman
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1990 13:43

20 lines
1504 bytes

In article <29251@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@pepsi.amd.com () writes:
>If you didn't want shadow RAM for some reason, that
>384K is totally unrelocatable and therefore wasted. Even if you did
>want 64K or 128K of shadow RAM, you don't want it for your EMS
>pageframe, so that 64K is wasted. Etc.
>
>Are there other chip sets which are known to not be so wasteful
>of RAM?
 Have you looked into software packages that can make use of the 
wasted 384 k between 640 and 1meg? One that comes to mind is
_386 Max_ from Qualitas. Their manual says the SHADOWRAM feature
will make use of the 384 k if for some reason you want to disable
the shadowram. QEMM might also do this, although I'm not 100% sure.

 
================================================================================
Ross Bannerman              |  uunet!mitel!infotech
Mitel Corp.                 +---------------------------------------------------
KANATA, Ont. Canada         | Insert standard legalese here....
================================================================LEAFS #1========

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2299@einstein.misemi>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mitel!einstein!infotech

References: <29251@amdcad.AMD.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mitel!einstein!infotech
From: infotech@einstein.misemi (Ross Bannerman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: C&T NEAT chipset problems
Message-ID: <2299@einstein.misemi>
Date: 23 Feb 90 13:43:28 GMT
References: <29251@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Reply-To: infotech@einstein.UUCP (Ross Bannerman)
Organization: MITEL Corporation, Kanata, Ontario, Canada.
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message