Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #43161Sun PC/NFS sockdrv.sys vs qemm
From: phil
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 1990 02:36
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 1990 02:36
9 lines
873 bytes
873 bytes
I just saw an article where someone said they used Qualitas' 386^max to
load sockdrv.sys in the 384K area. I'm using Quarterdeck's QEMM 5.0 and
loadhi complains about something that sockdrv's doing. Is there
something different/better that Qualitas does or is QEMM's msg something
that can cheerfully be ignored?
--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com {uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
A PC without DESQview is like Unix without ^Z.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<29356@amdcad.AMD.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!amdcad!pepsi.amd.com!philShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!amdcad!pepsi.amd.com!phil From: phil@pepsi.amd.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.dcom.lans Subject: Sun PC/NFS sockdrv.sys vs qemm Message-ID: <29356@amdcad.AMD.COM> Date: 3 Mar 90 02:36:47 GMT Sender: news@amdcad.AMD.COM Reply-To: phil@pepsi.amd.com () Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Sunnyvale CA Lines: 9